Announcement Icon Announcement: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec et quam blandit odio sodales pharetra.

Trading Equity Portfolio

“How to Read the Risk-Return Table – Why 7-10 Years is the Minimum for Equity Success”

“In this article we decode the risk-return table based on 26 years of data (1999-2025) and explain how holding an equity portfolio for at least 7 years — ideally 10 or more — improves your chances of achieving consistent positive returns. We look at probability buckets, average/maximum/minimum returns and what they mean for you.”

3 min read   |   17-May-2025   |   Last Updated: 01 Nov 2025
Author Image

Written by: SERNET Research Team

Blog Image
Table of Content

How To Read The Risk-return Table Below?

Often, there are questions as to whether an equity portfolio held for long term can really beat expectations and what does long-term mean? A quick look at the data put out by Fundsindia.com has some key takeaways. This is the data on probability of different levels of returns over different holding periods. Here data has been taken into account for a period of 26 years from 1999 to 2025. The question is what does equity portfolio here refer to? Here, the reference is to Nifty 50 TRI, but as a practical proxy, investors can consider a diversified mutual fund portfolio of large cap stocks or preferably multi-cap stocks. Again, this data refers to the past, and may not be true for the future. 

PROBABILITIES OF EQUITY PORTFOLIO RETURNS ACROSS DIFFERENT TIME FRAMES 
Returns Range  1-Year  3-Years  5-Years  7-Years  10-Years  12-Years  15-Years 
Less than 0%  23.0%  6.0%  0.1%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0% 
Less than 7%  36.0%  22.0%  13.0%  2.0%  1.0%  2.0%  0.0% 
Above 7%  64.0%  78.0%  87.0%  98.0%  99.0%  98.0%  100.0% 
Above 10%  58.0%  68.0%  74.0%  84.0%  84.0%  90.0%  96.0% 
Above 12%  53.0%  58.0%  66.0%  68.0%  70.0%  72.0%  79.0% 
Above 15%  46.0%  42.0%  39.0%  37.0%  38.0%  31.0%  32.0% 
Average Returns  16.0%  15.0%  15.0%  15.0%  14.0%  14.0%  14.0% 
Maximum Returns  108.0%  62.0%  47.0%  30.0%  22.0%  22.0%  19.0% 
Minimum Returns  -55.0%  -15.0%  -1.0%  5.0%  5.0%  6.0%  9.0% 
Data Source: FundsIndia.com 

What Is Special About The 7 Year Holding Period?

There is nothing special about the 7-year holding period. What this table tells us is that if you hold the equity portfolio for a period of at least 7 years, you start to see the real signs of risk-return trade-off playing in your favour. Here 7-year holding period refers to any continuous period of 7 years between 1999 and 2025. By holding the equity portfolio for 7 years, the probability of negative returns is zero, so you make positive returns for sure. Also, there is a 98% probability that you will earn over 7% CAGR with a 7 year holding period. However, minimum-maximum return variance is still quite high. 

What Happens When We Hold Equities For 10 Years Or More?

While 7 years is the cut-off to almost eliminate the chance of negative returns, let us look at the key benefits of holding for a longer period than that. 

  1.  When the equity portfolio is held for 10 years, there is a 99% probability of earning over 7% and a 70% probability of earning over 12% returns. There is also a 38% probability of earning more than 15% CAGR on the equity portfolio over 10 years.
  2. When the equity portfolio is held for 12 years, there is a 98% probability of earning over 7% and a 72% probability of earning over 12% returns. There is also a 31% probability of earning more than 15% CAGR on the equity portfolio over 12 years.
  3. When the equity portfolio is held for 15 years, there is a 100% probability of earning over 7% and a 79% probability of earning over 12% returns. There is also a 32% probability of earning more than 15% CAGR on the equity portfolio over 15 years.
  4. However, if you look at shorter holding periods like 1 year, 3 years, or 5 years, the probabilities are quite volatile. That is something to be cautious about. 

It appears that a 10-year holding period is good enough to get best benefits of long term. Beyond that, it lead to risk substitution, hence at that point, let the goals drive tenure. 

Comments